The maiden participation in a difficult and tricky “
This year’s edition of “
After a chain of disappointments in previous events, Dmitry decided to analyze the origin of such misfortunes. What is necessary to decrease the possibility of such a “misfortune” that can easily break all the plans for the rally? That was the main psychological question for the driver to find the answer before the “
But there was one problem to fulfill these “observation” plans on the first section of the rally, and the name for that problem was the starting order. Being the leader of the National Cup, Dmitry received the number “By the way, on that second stage there happened a couple of serious crashes: the rally was over for the sensation-maker Lukjanuk and also for 2008 FIA cross-country Cup winner Alexandr Mironenko.
On the second run of “Dubinino” Travnikov set the best time again, but Tagirov was second and now he was also second in the overall classification. But the second run of “Perevoznoye”, that completed the first section of the rally – changed the situation significantly. Tagirov again was second here, but the best time was set with another cross-country driver, the “
That leading position was a serious disadvantage for Dmitry and Anna as they didn’t have a chance to control the competitiors from behind again, like they wanted to do. But a sudden help came from… a mistake! A simple delay at the service park cost them 3 minutes lateness. The crew joked later: “Who would believe it was really a mistake, our inattention! Everybody would say we tried to play some tactic games, like big guys in WRC. But it was really so – we were simply late from the café, nothing else!”
Any way now they were not first on the road. Fedotov, who was now running first understood, that the leader got the 30 seconds penalty. And he was really flying in attempt to cut the rest of Tagirov’s advantage! Now there was a perfect landmark – to have such an ace in front, who is willing to win and does his best to catch that win. All the rest of the rally Dmitry and Anna were doing exactly what they planned to do: watching the competitor. Probably the main disappointment that day came not to their rivals, who couldn’t beat the Tagirov’s crew, but… to the spectators and photographers, as Dmitry and Anna tried to avoid any risks, getting slow in dangerous places, where was some possibilities to damage the car. They also succeeded in the work with their pacenotes, using the double run of the stages and making all the necessary marks and corrections. Now they could see how Fedotov was going, even could see his lines – and could play their own game, keeping hundred percent confidence.
By the end of the rally Dmitry and Anna not only protected their leadership, but managed to improve it, as they had won all the stages of the second section. And they did it, not pushing to the limit! That result – to achieve the goal, completely following the plans, keeping maximum confidence – admires them not less than the victory itself. That was an unfamiliar event for them, they had a car that was new for them on gravel, they had very strong rivals – but they managed to follow the strategy. The strategy that is well known from the old English racing proverb: to finish first, first you have to finish!
Dmitry TAGIROV, the driver: “After our disappointments in Gukovo and Satka I managed to understand for myself that rallying is too complicated racing discipline to be only a question of pure speed. And that time we were driving as much dispassionately, as it was possible. Being honest, I would prefer to start third to the second section to observe everything what was happening in front of us, to see the competitors’ lines. We almost tried to “lose” that leading position, but the problem was that nobody managed to pick it up! I didn’t know that route at all, but I had heard a lot about it. So I wanted to learn and feel all its tricks and difficulties, all these “3D” curves, all the bends with the jumps, bumps on the entrances to the curves… We made a lot of marks in our pacenotes and used these marks on the second passes. We understood that our pacenotes work fine in different conditions and we are really satisfied with that fact. On the second passes we were approximately one second per kilometer faster, but together with that possibility to increase the speed – we still have a possibility of extra practice work in the fast places. It could seem unbelievable, but on such a rough and stony route, like where so many crews crashed – was quite clear for me. Entering that turn with the descent you have to understand that it tightens in the end, and choose the entrance point perfectly. But if you drive with a reasonable reserve – you still have a possibility for slight corrections of that entrance point, then making a mark in your pacenotes for future passes. So really no problem there!
For the first time that season we managed to make our performance as much dispassionate and following the planned strategy as it is possible. Yes, there are still too many things for me to learn about these abilities. But the main result of “